{"presentation":{"slides":[{"elements":[{"x":4.357298474945534,"y":4.319654427645788,"width":71.89542483660131,"height":95.03239740820734,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

\n\t
This method of contract selection is used for input-based contracts and performance-based contracts<\/span><\/strong>. Under this method, the agencies bidding for the contract are asked to submit two separate proposals (as specified in the RFP)\u2014one technical and one financial. Both proposals are evaluated or scored according to the criteria shared in the RFP.<\/p>\n\t<\/li>\n\t
\n\t
This selection method is an important feature of the performance-based contracting because it allows the procuring entity (central, state, or district) to thoroughly examine the technical skill of the proposers\/bidders.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\t<\/li>\n\t
\n\t
The final selection is done based on the total combined score (technical and financial),<\/span><\/strong> and in the calculation, different \u2018weights\u2019 can be given to the technical evaluation score and financial evaluation score.<\/p>\n\t<\/li>\n\t
\n\t
To ensure high quality of work, it is recommended that the technical evaluation should be given a higher weightage than the financial evaluation.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\t<\/li>\n\t
\n\t
A weightage of 70 percent for technical scoring and 30 percent for financial scoring<\/span><\/strong> is recommended to ensure that technically stronger vendors get selected.<\/p>\n\t<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"},"subContentId":"dbbda1fd-f563-4131-9da3-9002c83a0df5","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""},{"x":77.34204793028323,"y":28.077753779697623,"width":19.607843137254903,"height":38.44492440604752,"action":{"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","file":{"path":"images\/file-64bb838e97181.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":512,"height":512},"expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image"},"subContentId":"7201ab16-f6b5-4263-9515-452ff62384ba","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"elements":[{"x":54.46623093681917,"y":12.958963282937365,"width":41.394335511982575,"height":71.27429805615552,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"
Example-<\/strong>
\nThree proposers A, B and C have applied for a particular assignment. Their technical and financial evaluations have been completed.<\/p>\n\n
\n\t
Technical evaluation. <\/span><\/strong>Proposer C received the highest marks in technical evaluation (91 points out of 100), and proposers A and B received 79 and 85 marks, respectively.<\/li>\n\t
Financial evaluation.<\/strong> <\/span>Proposer A has the quoted the lowest bid with a per-patient cost of INR 2,300 per patient, and proposers B and C have quoted INR 2,417 and INR 2,576, respectively.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"},"subContentId":"03be9787-fc71-40b7-ac3a-5d7ac1f0d6ac","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""},{"x":3.2679738562091503,"y":8.639308855291576,"width":50.10893246187364,"height":78.61771058315335,"action":{"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","file":{"path":"images\/file-64bb854dde882.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":1691,"height":1348},"expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image"},"subContentId":"ae14a63c-749d-48e8-a662-3f1c36c2a6e4","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""},{"x":11.982570806100219,"y":88.55291576673866,"width":37.03703703703704,"height":6.479481641468682,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"
Table: Demonstration of QCBS scoring<\/strong><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"c8d55e9b-94a6-400f-a35a-95e8158f69f0","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"elements":[{"x":4.357298474945534,"y":4.321805067704599,"width":91.50326797385621,"height":95.68034557235421,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"
The final scoring and selection is done in three steps:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

\n(a)   Technical scoring: <\/strong><\/span>To calculate the technical score, the highest marks achieved in the technical evaluation are used as a denominator as follows:<\/p>\n\n
\n\t
A\u2019s technical score = A\u2019s marks in technical evaluation (that is, 79) \/ marks of the highest scorer (that is, 91) \u00d7 100 = 86.81<\/li>\n\t
Similarly, B\u2019s technical score = B\u2019s marks in technical evaluation (that is, 85) \/ marks of the highest scorer (that is, 91) \u00d7 100 = 93.41<\/li>\n\t
C\u2019s technical score = 91 \/ 91 \u00d7 100 = 100.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
(b)   Financial scoring:<\/strong><\/span> To calculate the financial score, the lowest bid (L-1) is used as the denominator:<\/p>\n\n
\n\t
A\u2019s financial score = A\u2019s bid (that is, 2,300) \/ lowest bid (that is, 2,300) \u00d7 100 = 100<\/li>\n\t
B\u2019s financial score = B\u2019s bid (that is, 2,417) \/ lowest bid (that is, 2300) \u00d7 100 = 95.15<\/li>\n\t
C\u2019s financial score = C\u2019s bid (that is, 2,576) \/ lowest bid (that is, 2,300) \u00d7 100 = 89.28.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"},"subContentId":"ba9caf82-7296-45b6-a339-ecb08df9a573","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"elements":[{"x":4.357298474945534,"y":4.3210920058298665,"width":91.50326797385621,"height":95.68034557235421,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"
(c)   Combined scoring:<\/strong><\/span> As a final step, the technical and financial scores are combined. In this example, the procuring entity has decided to use a weightage distribution of 70 percent and 30 percent for technical and financial scoring, respectively. Therefore, the combined final score was calculated as follows:<\/p>\n\n

\nFinal score (S) = (T \/ T High \u00d7 70) + (C Low \/ C \u00d7 30),<\/span><\/strong>
\nwhere,<\/p>\n\n
\n\t
T = Technical evaluation score of the proposer,<\/li>\n\t
T High = Highest technical score among the proposers,<\/li>\n\t
C Low = Lowest quote of financial proposal among the proposers, and<\/li>\n\t
C = Quote of financial proposal by the proposer.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n

\nGiven the higher weightage to technical scoring, proposer C wins the bid in the example, even though its financial bid was higher than the other two. This makes it clear that the QCBS method gives an opportunity to procure entities to select agencies with better technical capacity.<\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"44ae69e6-1175-4552-bd29-edaf77c2bdb8","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}}],"keywordListEnabled":true,"globalBackgroundSelector":{},"keywordListAlwaysShow":false,"keywordListAutoHide":false,"keywordListOpacity":90},"override":{"activeSurface":false,"hideSummarySlide":false,"summarySlideSolutionButton":true,"summarySlideRetryButton":true,"enablePrintButton":false,"social":{"showFacebookShare":false,"facebookShare":{"url":"@currentpageurl","quote":"I scored @score out of @maxScore on a task at @currentpageurl."},"showTwitterShare":false,"twitterShare":{"statement":"I scored @score out of @maxScore on a task at @currentpageurl.","url":"@currentpageurl","hashtags":"h5p, course"},"showGoogleShare":false,"googleShareUrl":"@currentpageurl"}},"l10n":{"slide":"Slide","score":"Score","yourScore":"Your Score","maxScore":"Max Score","total":"Total","totalScore":"Total Score","showSolutions":"Show solutions","retry":"Retry","exportAnswers":"Export text","hideKeywords":"Hide sidebar navigation menu","showKeywords":"Show sidebar navigation menu","fullscreen":"Fullscreen","exitFullscreen":"Exit fullscreen","prevSlide":"Previous slide","nextSlide":"Next slide","currentSlide":"Current slide","lastSlide":"Last slide","solutionModeTitle":"Exit solution mode","solutionModeText":"Solution Mode","summaryMultipleTaskText":"Multiple tasks","scoreMessage":"You achieved:","shareFacebook":"Share on Facebook","shareTwitter":"Share on Twitter","shareGoogle":"Share on Google+","summary":"Summary","solutionsButtonTitle":"Show comments","printTitle":"Print","printIngress":"How would you like to print this presentation?","printAllSlides":"Print all slides","printCurrentSlide":"Print current slide","noTitle":"No title","accessibilitySlideNavigationExplanation":"Use left and right arrow to change slide in that direction whenever canvas is selected.","accessibilityCanvasLabel":"Presentation canvas. Use left and right arrow to move between slides.","accessibilityProgressBarLabel":"Choose slide to display","containsNotCompleted":"@slideName contains not completed interaction","containsCompleted":"@slideName contains completed interaction","slideCount":"Slide @index of @total","containsOnlyCorrect":"@slideName only has correct answers","containsIncorrectAnswers":"@slideName has incorrect answers","shareResult":"Share Result","accessibilityTotalScore":"You got @score of @maxScore points in total","accessibilityEnteredFullscreen":"Entered fullscreen","accessibilityExitedFullscreen":"Exited fullscreen","confirmDialogHeader":"Submit your answers","confirmDialogText":"This will submit your results, do you want to continue?","confirmDialogConfirmText":"Submit and see results","slideshowNavigationLabel":"Slideshow navigation"}}

Search

PPM: Methods of bid evaluation

Target Audience

Least Cost Selection

Quality and cost-based selection

Quality-Based Selection